Appeal Result: Permission Granted
Description: The works proposed are the replacement of all current single glazed 6 pane windows with new 2 pane double glazed windows.
Council Refusal Stated: "The proposed windows by virtue of the use of double glazing and design detailing, would fail to preserve the special architectural interest of the listed building and would detract from its character, thus resulting in harm to the significance of the heritage asset. The level of harm is considered to be 'less than substantial' and in this case the public benefit does not outweigh this identified harm (paragraph 196 of NPPF). Therefore, the proposal is contrary to paragraph 196 of the NPPF, Section 16 (2) & 66(1) of Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, RLP100 of the Adopted Local Plan, CS5 of the Adopted Core Strategy and Policy LPP60 of the Draft Local Plan."
Background: The client in this case was simply looking to modernise their home by improving the thermal and acoustic efficiency of their Grade II listed property. When the council issued the initial refusal it was incredibly unfair as the adjoining semi already enjoyed the benefit of double glazed windows with permission. LSE broke down the LPA's argument by demonstrating that the important features which justified the original listed status of the building did not include the windows. Furthermore analysis showed that the existing windows were not even original features, so did constitute historic materials or architectural features that warranted preservation.